Showing posts with label peopling the Americas. Show all posts
Showing posts with label peopling the Americas. Show all posts

Sunday, October 11, 2015

One Migration from Siberia Peopled the Americas: Study

Native American ancestors reached the New World in a single, initial migration from Siberia at most 23,000 years ago, only later differentiating into today’s distinct groups, DNA research revealed Tuesday.

Most scientists agree the Americas were peopled by forefathers who crossed the Bering land and ice bridge which connected modern-day Russia and Alaska in Earth’s last glacial period.

And it is known through archaeological finds that humans were already present in the Americas 15,000 years ago.

But there was a long list of outstanding questions.

When did the migration take place? In one or several waves? And how long did these early pioneers spend in Beringia — the then-raised land area between Asia and America?

On Tuesday, analysis of Native American and Siberian DNA, present-day and ancient, sought to fill in some of the blanks with two studies carried simultaneously in the journals Science and Nature.

The first, led by the Center for GeoGenetics at the University of Copenhagen and published in Science, found there was only one initial migration, no more than 23,000 years ago.

This ancestral pool split into two main branches about 13,000 years ago, coinciding with glacier melt and the opening of routes into the North American interior, researchers found.

These became the groups which anthropologists refer to as Amerindians (American Indians) and Athabascans (a native Alaskan people).

Previous research had suggested that Amerindian and Athabascan ancestors had crossed the strait independently.

“Our study presents the most comprehensive picture of the genetic prehistory of the Americas to date,” said Maanasa Raghavan, one of the study’s lead authors.

“We show that all Native Americans, including the major sub-groups of Amerindians and Athabascans, descend from the same migration wave into the Americas.”

This was distinct from later waves which gave rise to the Paleo-Eskimo and Inuit populations, she added.

Given that the earliest evidence for the presence of humans in the Americas dates to 15,000 years ago, the first ancestors may have remained in Beringia for about 8,000 years before their final push into the New World, the team said.

This is much shorter than the tens of thousands of years of isolation theorized by some earlier research.

But diversification into the distinct tribes we know today, happened only after arrival in the Americas, not before.

The second study showed that, surprisingly, some Amazonians descend from forefathers more closely related to the indigenous peoples of Australia, New Guinea and the Andaman Islands than present-day fellow Native Americans.

“Present-day groups in South America have a small but distinct genetic link to Australasians,” co-author Pontus Skoglund of the Harvard Medical School told AFP of the research published in Nature.

This may explain a long-standing riddle: why, if Native Americans came from Eurasia, do some early American skeletons share traits with present-day Australasians?

But how and when this forefather came to the Americas remains “an open question,” said the study.
_________________
Reference:

Discovery News. 2015. “One Migration from Siberia Peopled the Americas: Study”. Discovery News. Posted: July 21, 2015. Available online: http://news.discovery.com/human/evolution/one-migration-from-siberia-peopled-the-americas-study-15072.htm

Tuesday, July 1, 2014

Genetic study helps resolve years of speculation about first people in the Americas

A new study could help resolve a longstanding debate about the origins of the first people to inhabit the Americas, researchers report in the journal Science. The study relies on genetic information extracted from the tooth of an adolescent girl who fell into a sinkhole in the Yucatan 12,000 to 13,000 years ago.

The girl's remains were found alongside those of ancient extinct beasts that also fell into the "inescapable natural trap," as researchers described the sinkhole. The team used radiocarbon dating and analyzed chemical signatures in bones and in flowerlike crystals that grew on the bones to determine how long ago the girl lived.

Scientists have long debated the origins of the first Americans. Most accept – and numerous genetic analyses support the view – that the original immigrants crossed over a land bridge that once connected northeast Asia to present-day Alaska.

The most ancient remains have baffled scientists, however, because the skulls are narrower and have other measurably different features than those of Native Americans. Some researchers hypothesize that these individuals came to the Americas from as far away as Australia or Southeast Asia.

The girl who fell into the sinkhole had a skull with the unusual shape. And, luckily for the researchers, her bones still held genetic material that could be analyzed to determine her origins.

"There are lots and lots of theories about the peopling of the Americas and who was where when," said University of Illinois anthropology and Institute for Genomic Biology professor Ripan Malhi, whose lab was one of three to conduct genetic analyses for the new study. "And it seems like genetic research is slowly falsifying a lot of these theories."

The laboratories of Brian Kemp at Washington State University and Deborah Bolnick at the University of Texas each independently extracted and analyzed mitochondrial DNA from the ancient girl's tooth. Genetic material from the mitochondria (energy-generating structures found in every cell) is more plentiful than that found in the nucleus of cells, and so is easier to study.

Malhi also analyzed the mitochondrial DNA, focusing on regions of the mitogenome that code for specific proteins. These coding regions mutate more slowly than noncoding parts of the genome, and so can be more reliable markers of genetic relatedness.

The Kemp, Bolnick and Malhi labs each independently found that the ancient girl belonged to a genetic lineage that is shared only by Native Americans.

"We were able to identify her genetic lineage with high certainty," Malhi said. "This shows that living Native Americans and these ancient remains of the girl we analyzed all came from the same source population during the initial peopling of the Americas."

Forensic anthropologist, archaeologist and paleontologist James Chatters, of Applied Paleoscience in Bothell, Washington, led the new analysis. Chatters is best known for his work on Kennewick Man, another ancient individual whose origins were debated because his skull was markedly different from those of Native Americans. The Kennewick Man remains were found in Kennewick, Washington, in 1996.

The research was an international effort involving scientists, divers and technicians from more than a dozen institutions.

The following links are to associated articles: http://www.sciencemag.org/lookup/doi/10.1126/science.1252619

http://www.pasthorizonspr.com/index.php/archives/05/2014/dna-links-palaeoamericans-and-modern-native-americans
_________________ References:

EurekAlert. 2014. “Genetic study helps resolve years of speculation about first people in the Americas”. EurekAlert. Posted: may 15, 2014. Available online: http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2014-05/uoia-gsh051214.php

Monday, October 24, 2011

The seaweed trail: Peopling the Americas

Mapmakers once thought the earth was flat. Astronomers used to believe the sun circled the earth. As late as the 1990s, archaeologists were convinced that the original American settlers crossed a land bridge from Asia into Alaska, found daylight between the glaciers, and gradually followed it south. According to what had been orthodox thinking, that happened about 12,000 years ago.

“Suppose it were true,” says Jack Rossen, associate professor and chair of the Department of anthropology. “Suppose you could find a corridor through a mile-high wall of ice and follow it for a thousand miles. What would you eat? Popsicles?”

A practical alternative

There are seaweed belts along the western coast of the Americas, from Alaska to Chile, and they’re as ecologically complex as rain forests,” he says. “There are canopy species of animals, species of animals beneath the canopy, including fish, and there’s the seaweed itself, which is incredibly rich in nutrients. What would people rather do? Try to find a meal in a world of ice, or take a boat down the coast and help themselves to fish, oysters, and greens?”

In retrospect, the seaweed trail makes sense. But as recently as 15 years ago, it was archaeological heresy to think that North and South America’s first humans didn’t use the land route. The evidence for that conventional wisdom came from a site excavated in the 1930s near what is now Clovis, New Mexico. According to carbon dating, the stone spear points discovered there were 11,200 years old, making Clovis the oldest known settlement in the Americas. The assumption was that hunter-gatherers from Asia had hiked south from the Bering land bridge, living off the occasional mastodon and whatever else they could find.

But in 1975 a visiting veterinary student came across what he thought was a cow bone exposed along a creek bed in southern Chile, some 50 miles from the Pacific coast. When the “bone” turned out to be a mastodon tusk, Tom Dillehay, a renowned archaeologist then at the University of Kentucky (now at Vanderbilt University), and his Chilean colleagues realized they had a prehistoric site on their hands. In 1976 the Dillehay team began an excavation project in Monte Verde, Chile, that would occupy them for the next nine years. In 1983 Dillehay asked one of his dissertation advisees — Jack Rossen — to join the dig.

“He wanted me along because I knew how plant use among ancient cultures — both as food and medicine — reveals how those communities are organized,” Rossen says. “That background was important at Monte Verde because Tom knew the site was going to contain a fair amount of preserved plant life.”

“A fair amount” turned out to be 72 different kinds of plants, including seeds, nuts, berries, and a specimen of wild potato carbon dated at 13,000 years old. “That kind of abundance,” says Rossen, “is unheard of in archaeological science.”

In addition to the plants, Dillehay’s team found a 20-foot long tentlike structure of wood and animal hides, a human footprint small enough to be a child’s, two outdoor hearths, more than 700 finely crafted bone and stone tools, and hundreds of other artifacts.

Not only was the abundance of the findings extraordinary, so was their state of preservation. Normally, plants and other organic materials break down over time, but fallen logs had dammed the creek along which the settlement was founded. Peat moss began building up, and within months the site turned into a bog and had to be abandoned. An air-tight insulator, the peat kept biodegradable material from decaying. Dillehay and his researchers found themselves excavating a mummified village.

“Everything was preserved,” Rossen says. “We used dental picks to excavate it, that’s how meticulous we were.”

A medicine hut provides a clue

That attention to detail paid off. On the floor of what had been a wishbone-shaped structure, Rossen and his colleagues uncovered scatterings of bite-sized lumps shaped like half moons.

“The wishbone structure was most likely a medicine hut,” Rossen says. “And the lumps turned out to be chewed cuds containing five species of seaweed mixed with a variety of purgatives, antibiotics, and other medicinal plants.”

That was remarkable, Rossen says, because at the time of its habitation, Monte Verde was 50 miles from the nearest sea coast. More remarkable: some of the seaweed was from rocky coasts, some from sandy coasts, and some of the plants came from as far as 250 miles away. Even more remarkable: the array of plants
included species that weren’t available year-round. They’d been harvested at different times of the year.

“That’s how we know the people who settled Monte Verde stayed there all year long,” Rossen says. “That also tells us they weren’t colonizers because people who are just settling into a place don’t have detailed knowledge of their surroundings. Nor do they have the kinds of established social and trade networks that can bring in plant species from remote locations. The people who lived at Monte Verde had been there a while.”

How long was “a while”? According to the carbon-dated objects at the site, at least 12,500 years. Aha! A human settlement was thriving in southern Chile 500 years before the first settlers were supposed to have crossed a land bridge 10,000 miles to the north.

“Finding a site older than Clovis was a complete paradigm shift, and a lot of people didn’t want to go along with it,” Rossen says. “Showing that humans had been living in the Americas a lot longer than anyone imagined was very controversial and required a very high standard of proof.”

That standard included a 1,000-page research report circulated among leading archaeologists. For years, experts scrutinized the data from the Monte Verde digs, and in 1997, after what Pulitzer Prize–winning journalist John Noble Wilford called “a pitched intellectual battle. . . over when people first inhabited the Americas,” a team of archaeologists sponsored by the National Geographic Society and Dallas Museum of Natural History visited the site. The report they issued vindicated the findings at Monte Verde.

“Monte Verde is real,” wrote Alex W. Barker, chief curator of the Dallas Museum of Natural History. “It’s old. And it’s a whole new ball game.”

Since then, about 25 sites — including two in Brazil and another on an island off the California coast — have been discovered that also pre-date Clovis. In addition, objects from a deeper layer at Monte Verde have been carbon dated to be nearly 33,000 years old. In other words, people were established in South America almost 22,000 — not just 1,300 — years before Clovis.

In case anyone’s still not totally convinced, evidence from those digs in the 1980s is still coming in. In the May 2008 issue of Science, an article co-authored by Dillehay, Rossen, and others presented a recently completed study of nine species of seaweed found at Monte Verde, including microscopic particles ingrained along the edge of a stone tool. The study confirmed the original findings.

“Originally, we collected more material than we had time to study,” Rossen says. “But archaeological projects never end. The analysis continues years after the excavations are done. There’s always something more you can do with the material.”

A convincing route

Though archaeologists are now convinced of the coastal route, they’re still sorting out the details. For example, where and how did those early hunter-gatherers stop floating down the coast, foray inland, and settle? It’s hard to tell, since sea levels have risen over the millennia. Sites where ancient people could have established coastal communities are now 200 feet under water. The step-by-step movements of ancient Americans may never be precisely mapped, but Rossen isn’t discouraged.

“Knowing how these people lived is more important than knowing every detail of how they got there, because ancient people have a lot to teach us,” he says. “During 99 percent of our history, humans have been hunter-gatherers — or more accurately, gatherer-hunters — and we’re still that way at heart. We may live in large cities, but we still function best in groupings of 15 to 20 people. And the way we run errands — finding where the bargains are, who has the best service, where the best food is — replicates the behaviour patterns of people who know where to go when potatoes are in season, where the best wood is, and which berries to pick.”

Ancient people can also teach us a thing or two about medicine.

“Some of the plants we found at Monte Verde are currently being used in commercial cough syrup,” Rossen says. “Also, because a lot of the food plants used at Monte Verde have an amazingly high nutritional value, those nutrients can treat contemporary people suffering from vitamin deficiencies.”

Among those plants: seaweed.

“Seaweed fills the same nutritional gaps now as it did 20,000 years ago,” Rossen says. “I recommend it. It tastes great.”
______________
References:

Davis, Keith. 2011. "The seaweed trail: Peopling the Americas". Past Horizons. Posted: October 12, 2011. Available online: http://www.pasthorizonspr.com/index.php/archives/10/2011/the-seaweed-trail-peopling-the-americas